![]() |
ISSN: 2158-7051 ==================== INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN STUDIES ==================== ISSUE NO. 9 ( 2020/1 ) |
CHALLENGING SOVIET UNION’S INFLUENCE AND SOVIET BLOC UNITY: UNITED STATES ECONOMIC AID TO YUGOSLAVIA IN EARLY COLD WAR
ZENG QINGMING*
Summary
After
the end of the Second World War, Yugoslavia, as one of the victorious
countries, received various assistances for its post-war reconstruction from
United States, Britain, France and Soviet Union. The Soviets expulsion of
Yugoslavs out of Cominform in 1948 signalized the unfolding of the first
Soviet-Yugoslav conflict, which led to the subsequent economic blockade of
Yugoslavia from Soviet bloc countries. Faced with potential Soviets military
invasion and political subversion, as well as worsening domestic economic
situation resulted from collectivization and drought, Yugoslavia changed its
strategic orientation to the West and turned to United States for help.
American thought the tension between Yugoslavia and Soviet bloc would be used
to further widen the split within the Soviet bloc, so they actively developed
several programs to “keep Tito afloat”. This paper examines the evolution of
the American efforts to aid Yugoslavia in the early Cold War period.
Key Words: Yugoslavia, United States, Economic Aid, Cold War.
Introduction
United States
aid to Yugoslavia in the post-Second World War period started through the
United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) program.
Considered the harsh economic situation in Yugoslavia following the devastating
effect of the Second World War, UNRRA decided to provide grains, powered eggs,
food, clothing, medical supplies to stop mass starvation and to rehabilitate
agriculture in Yugoslavia. Documents from the Yugoslav side suggests that for
July 1945, the UNRRA donated 55, 923 tons of diverse items ranging from
industrial resources like raw materials, to basic necessities like clothings
and food (Yugoslav Archive 1956) to Yugoslavia. From January 1945 until June
1947, UNRRA distributed supplied totaling $415.6 million, of which 72% came
from the United States (Lampe and Russell eds. 1990, 21). Although in the later
period United States was suspicious about how Yugoslavia distributed the
assistance and finally suspended the program in 1947, Americans later clearly
admitted that “UNRRA achievement in Yugoslavia was tremendous” (Geuvjehizian
1963, 21). From October, 1945 to the end of 1946, from 3,000,000 to 5,000,000
people in Montenegro, Slovenia, Herzegovina, Dalmatia, and Croatia were fed
“exclusively” by UNRRA aid; and another 3,000,000 received part of their food
from the same source (Tomasevich 1949, 404-405). With tremendous assistance
from the UNRRA, Yugoslav agricultural and industrial productions gradually
recovered from the catastrophic effects of the Second World War. (see Table
1.1). In agricutural aspect, major crops production increased steadily during
1946 to 1950. Regarding the recovery of domestic industry, Yugoslavs were proud
to claim that their industrial output in 1947 was 120.6 percent of the pre-war
1939 level (Dennison 1977: 21).
Table
1.1: Production of Selected Corps in Yugoslavia, 1946-50* (thousands of metric
tons)
|
1946 |
1947 |
1948 |
1949 |
1950 |
Wheat |
2,136 |
1,905 |
2,400 |
2,586 |
2,500 |
Rye |
241 |
203 |
203 |
229 |
229 |
Corn |
2,693 |
5,080 |
4,696 |
4,824 |
5,000 |
Barley |
429 |
381 |
404 |
412 |
400 |
Oats |
312 |
305 |
327 |
335 |
330 |
Total |
5,811 |
7,874 |
8,030 |
8,366 |
8,459 |
Pig Iron |
82.8 |
163.0 |
172.0 |
185.0 |
200.0 |
Raw Steel |
202.0 |
150.0 |
200-235.0 |
235-250.0 |
250-275.0 |
Rolled Product |
148.0 |
145.0 |
175.0 |
178.0 |
180.0 |
Lead |
10.7 |
40.0 |
57.0 |
70.0 |
65.0 |
Zinc |
4.6 |
5.0 |
8.0 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
Aluminum |
2.4 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
2.0 |
Crude Oil |
21.3 |
38.6 |
36.3 |
63.0 |
100.0 |
Electric Power (billion
KWH) |
1.4 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.7 |
*Source: Central
Intelligence Agency. (1977) Economic
Situation in Yugoslavia. CIA Historical Review Program
Release in Full. 22.
In
the meantime, Soviets were trying to increase Yugoslavia’s economic dependence
on Soviet Union and other satellites countries. “For this reason, in the years
immediately after World War II Russia and the other Eastern countries purchased
many of Yugoslavia’s products and supplied their own goods in return”
(Sternberg 1952, 226). Soviet bloc countries’ imports and exports shared a very
large portion in Yugoslavia’s economy, which were exploited as political
instrument to subdue Yugoslavia under Soviet authority. In 1947, Soviet Union
shared 22.2% in total value of Yugoslavs import in 1947 and 16.8% in export. In
the same year, Soviet bloc countries shared 56.1% of the whole Yugoslav imports
and 52.7% of the exports (A.Z. 1956, 38-46). From the beginning of 1949 to June
1949 the economic isolation of Yugoslavia from the Comecon (The Council for
Mutual Economic Assistance led by Soviet Union) led to the dramatic drop in the
total amounts of Yugoslav exports and imports(see Table 2), which forced
Yugoslavia to reorient their economy more closer to Western economy (Ceh 1998,
167).
Table
1.2: Share of the Soviet Bloc Countries in Yugoslav Trade, 1947-1949*
|
Imports(per cent) |
Exports(per cent) |
||
|
1947 |
1948 |
1947 |
1948 |
U.S.S.R. |
22.2 |
10.8 |
16.8 |
15.0 |
Czechoslovakia |
17.6 |
17.1 |
18.8 |
15.9 |
Hungary |
5.0 |
4.4 |
8.3 |
9.0 |
Poland |
3.2 |
7.4 |
3.4 |
7.8 |
Bulgaria |
3.2 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.0 |
Romania |
0.6 |
1.7 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
Albania |
0.2 |
- |
- |
- |
E. Germany |
4.1 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
1.4 |
Total |
56.1 |
45.7 |
52.7 |
50.7 |
|
Exports(million
dollars) |
Imports(million
dollars) |
||||||
|
1948 |
1949 |
1948 |
1949 |
||||
Albania |
12.4 |
- |
6.0 |
- |
||||
Bulgaria |
6.8 |
- |
16.6 |
- |
||||
Czechoslovakia |
48.6 |
8.6 |
52.2 |
17.7 |
||||
Hungary |
26.8 |
3.9 |
13.9 |
6.5 |
||||
Poland |
23.7 |
5.0 |
23.1 |
6.5 |
||||
Romania |
3.1 |
- |
5.4 |
- |
||||
Sovzone Germany |
4.5 |
- |
12.1 |
- |
||||
Sovzone Austria |
6.2 |
- |
5.0 |
- |
||||
USSR |
45.5 |
9.1 |
337. |
4.7 |
||||
Total (from bloc) |
177.6 |
26.6 |
168.0 |
35.4 |
||||
Total (global) |
292.2 |
176.7 |
292.5 |
216.5 |
||||
*Source:
A.Z. (1956) The Soviet-Yugoslav
Economic Relations 1945-1955. The
World
Today. Royal Institute of International Affairs. 12(1):
36-38; Central Intelligence Agency. (1977) Economic
Situation in Yugoslavia. CIA Historical Review Program Release in Full. 22.
After
the Soviet Blockade: United States Relaxing Export and Import Control
The UNRRA aid ended in
June 1947 because of mutual distrust—Americans feared Yugoslav would use this
aid to support the popular Greek Communist Revolution, while Yugoslavs feared
economic aid would become a tool for American to demand Yugoslav political
concession in other issues. Without the generous support of UNRRA, Yugoslav
government requested American to release Yugoslavs prewar gold reserves held in
New York. Yugoslavs prewar loyal family transferred gold valued more than $100
million to the Federal Reserve in April 1941 (Jovanov 2009, 54-56). American
rejected the Yugoslavs request and “demanded compensation for the American
assets located in Yugoslavia and nationalized by Yugoslav government. In later
1948 Yugoslavs repeated their demand for the release of the gold held in the
Federal Reserve(Ibid.). Finally in the end of 1948 American decided to unblock
the gold reserve after the settlement with American firms(Ibid.).
The economic
blockade by Comecon, combined with Yugoslav doubled military budget and rising
foreign debt, pushed Yugoslav leaders turn to Americans for help. “If the U.S.
and the West wanted to use Yugoslavia as a wedge to disrupt the communist
movement, they would have to keep Tito’s economy afloat”(Heuser 1989, 81).
“…The West simply had no choice. Yugoslavia was going to be ruled either by
Tito or by a Stalinist puppet. The Kremlin would have its way in Yugoslavia if
the United States failed to come to Tito’s aid.”(Swissler 1993, 86-98).
Yugoslav
Export and Import to United States increased dramatically in 1948. At the
beginning of 1949, Yugoslavia export licenses were approved for a total of
$6,833,000. The United States also approved 10 oil well drilling rigs to be exported
to Yugoslavia. In September 1949, Yugoslavia renewed its export license to
purchase an American mill for steel production. Not only the license was
approval at the end of August 1949, but also Yugoslavs received $3.2 million
for this project (Jovanov 2009, 64-68). In 1947, the value of Yugoslav import
to U.S. was $11.0 million. This figure dramatically rised to $31.0 million in
1948. In 1948, Yugoslav export to U.S. totaled $8.0 million, which increased to
$17.0 million in 1948. (Lampe J. and Russell R. 1990, 30)
The
amounts of American license approval and denial increased significantly after
1948, which signalized the growing relationship between Yugoslavia and United
States. From National Security Council Progress Reportsin May 27 and November 9
(NSC 18/2 Progress Reports) in 1949 we can clearly see Yugoslavs growing
frequent economic contact with United States. During February and April 1949,
licenses approved amounted to $14,569,206. This amount in two months is about
20 percent, or some 2.5 million dollars, higher than the total applications
approved during all of 1948 (National Security Council May 27 1949). The
licenses denied during February and April 1949 is valued $8,122,615, of which about 85 percent, or $6,746,447, was
accounted for by the denial of applications for 10 of the total of 20 oil well
drilling rigs (Ibid.). In Autumn of 1949, the values of export licenses grew
from $876,692 in August to $8722,410 in September (Ibid.).
It is worth mentioning that total valued $80,595 of the
1-A items were approved to be exported in August and $480,549 of the 1-A items
approved in September (Ibid.). The approval of 1-A items to Yugoslavia shows
the Americans effort to secure Tito’s regime against the potential Soviet
invasion. 1-A items were restricted to be exported because “Class 1-A consisted
of munitions, equipments and materials primarily used in the production of
munitions that would contribute to the military potential of the Soviet
bloc”(U.S. Department of State 1948). American officials thought American
willingness to consider to export 1-A items to Yugoslavia “would clearly signal
Tito that the United States wished to contribute to his survival”. In August,
the 1-A item’s licenses approved covered one tinplate order valued at $137,233,
another hot dipped coke tinplate item worth $110,000, and jeep replacement
spare parts of $110,000 value. In the next month, the license for tracklaying
tractors worth $295,236 was approved along with the drilling equipment
(National Security Council Nov.9 1949). Although Americans approval of 1-A
exports to Yugoslavs were in exchange for the Yugoslavs closing border for
Greek communist guerrillas, the growing economic contact presented a “striking
opportunity” for United States to develop sound trade with Yugoslavia”
(Swissler 1993, 75-76).
Sustaining “Tito Effect” in the Soviet Bloc: United
States Extension of Credits and Loans to Yugoslavia
Yugoslavs economy suffered great losses from the
comeinform economic blockade whih started in the beginning of 1949. Learning
from the catastrophic effect of over economic dependence to the Soviet bloc,
Yugoslavs leader became increasingly aware of the need to have more frequent
economic interaction with the West, especially the United States. The Yugoslav
trade deficit had increased to $20 million in the year 1948 and to $50 million
in May 31, 1949. Although American achieved agreement with Yugoslavs about the
royal family’s prewar gold reserve in the Federal Reserve, $20 million of the
total $30 million reserve had already been used for Yugoslav current imports.
In May 1949, Yugoslavs demand for export credits of $25 million to
purchase material resources from the American Export-Import Bank was approved.
In August, another Yugoslavs request for a $20 million loans was approved
(Lampe and Russell eds. 1990, 32). In December, new American ambassador to
Yugoslavia V. Allen met with Tito and Yugoslav foreign minister Kardelj. Both
of them expressed their willingness to further develop Yugoslav economic
relation with United States. Now both sides had consensus, but the problem for
American is, how much Yugoslavs needed? As a staff in Yugoslav embassy
Abramovic described, Yugoslavia needed emergent aid from United States because
of the trade deficit as previous mentioned and the balance of payment crisis
which “if not addressed without delay, would halt all Yugoslav imports” (Ceh
1998, 98-107). For Abramovic, a credit of $25-30 million was in grave need for
Yugoslavs to purchases essential current imports and equipments.
Failure to achieve the goal would result in serious unemployment and harsh
economic situation which would greatly affect the stability of Tito’s regime
(Ibid.). The Yugoslavs ambassador to United States Kosanovic also expressed
that “Yugoslavia pending application before the World Bank for a general loan
of $500 million, of which $200 million would be used for specific projects in
the field of agriculture, mining, and industry” (Ibid.).
Even if
American agree to aid more, how Western economic aid could help Yugoslav
economy? Yugoslavs “Self-Management” socialist economy has its very distinctive
characters that are different from both the Soviet style economy and the
Western style economy. First, different from the Soviet Command Economy,
Yugoslavs self-management economy has no absolute authority that could
determine the economic development. Second, in joint ventures aspect, “Yugoslav
enterprises and foreign enterprises would be defined by special agreements
based on sharing profit and not on property ownership (Sarkovic 1986, 65-68).
Thus the foreign investors could not gain their own property in Yugoslavia.
Also, Yugoslav decentralized bureaucratic economy undermines Americans
willingness to invest because of the political uncertainty and risk. And the
lack of real information about the Yugoslavs economy obstruct those
international financial organization’s evaluation, hence major financial
organizations would not easily approve credits or loans to Yugoslavia. Yugoslav
foreign minister Kardelj claimed that if the West fails to provide economic aid
and Yugoslav economic situation continues to decline, it will create a fertile
soil for pro-Cominform agents in Yugoslavia to overthrow the Tito’s regime
(Swissler 1993, 99-100). He also claimed that Yugoslavs need to obtain a $6
million loan from the International Monetary Fund, $20 to $25 million from the
International Bank and $5 million from the Export-Import Bank immediately (U.S.
Department of State 1950).
United States
and the West actively offered generous economic aid to Yugoslavia to “keep Tito
afloat”. Immediately after the expulsion from Cominform, Yugoslavs received $17
million from United States. In August, Yugoslavia request for additional aid
was approved and it received a $20 million additional loan (Lampe and Russell
eds. 1990, 30). By October 1949, the International Monetary Fund offered a loan
of $3 million to Yugoslavia. In December 1949, West Germany signed a trade
agreement worth of $60 million with Yugoslavia under U.S. auspices. Britain
also signed a five-year $616 million trade agreement with Yugoslavia. United
States used its role in various international and domestic financial
institutions to provide economic aid to Yugoslavia. In 1949, Yugoslavia
received tremendous financial support from International Monetary Fund(IMF),
American Export-Import Bank, and other western countries’ banks. Under the
principle of “keeping Tito afloat”, American Export-Import Bank offered $20
million credits and loans to Yugoslavia in the single year of 1949.(see Table
2.1). On March 1 1950, the American Export-Import Bank granted another $20
million credits for Yugoslavs to purchase goaods and capital equipments.
Sources |
Amount |
International Monetary
Fund |
900,000
dollars |
American Export-Import
Bank |
20,000,000
dollars (interest rate 3.3%) |
Britain |
8,000,000
pounds (interest rate 5%) |
The Midlands Bank |
2,000,000
pounds (interest rate 5%) |
Netherland |
10,000,000
Dutch guilders (interest rate 5.5%) |
*Source: F.
Singleton. 1976. Twentieth-Century
Yugoslavia. Columbia University Press.
Mutual Trade
between United States and Yugoslavia grew significantly during 1947 and 1952 to
compensate Yugoslav losses from the Cominform blockade. The value of Yugoslav
exports grew from $3.5 million to $36.0 million in 1952, while value of imports
grew from $7.0 million to $146.6 million in the peak year of 1951.
*Source: Savezni Zavod za Statistiku. 1982. Razvoj Jugoslavije. 1947-1981.
Beograd 124;Lampe J. and Russell R. (1990). Yugoslav-American
Economic Relations since the World War II. Durham and London. Duke
University Press. 41.
From Table 2.2
We can clearly see that U.S. shares of Yugoslavs export continue to grow
steadily and reach the peak level—14.7% in 1952. In the meantime U.S. shares of
Yugoslavs import increased dramatically during 1947 and 1949, and it reached
the peak level—19.3% in 1951.
In
1951 Yugoslavia received a loan of $200 million from the International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). Later the approval of “the U.S. Mutual
Security Act of 1951 made the congressional funding possible, and soon
President Truman used his executive authority to support these grants (Ibid.,
40-41). “The International Monetary Fund exchange stabilization loan and the
Export-Import Bank loan aided the process of realignment of Yugoslav trade with
the West, but Yugoslavia also needed massive amounts of assistance from a
number of countries to offset the losses from the Soviet Union and Eastern
European satellites” (Swissler 1993, 183). United States actively mobilized
other financial partners in the West to aid Yugoslavia. From Table 2.3 we can
clearly see many Western countries such as previously mentioned Britain and
France, and those who just recovered from the catastrophic effect of the Second
World War, participated in the Americans program of “keeping Tito afloat”. For
Yugoslav leaders, growing frequent contacts and warming economic relation with
the West, especially with the United States, not only compensate their previous
economic losses from the Cominform blockade, but also decrease the potential
risk of a Soviet military invasion or political subversion. By providing economic
aid to foster the stability of the Tito’s regime, Americans were actually
implementing the wedge tactic toward the Soviet bloc. “the Central Intelligence
Agency(CIA) suggested that his[Tito] survival under Stalin’s pressure could
make it harder for the Kremlin to discipline other similar factions within the
bloc (Lees 1997. 52-53). “American policy toward Yugoslavia rested on a
cold-blooded calculation of self-interest on both sides (Campell 1967, 28).
U.S. economic aid was “small price to pay for what was the one strikingly
successful policy the U.S. was able to conduct in Eastern Europe during the
whole period since the war” (Ibid.). By fostering Tito’s heretical process of
drifting away from Soviet control, Americans could pursue a policy of fostering
division within the Soviet bloc (Jovanov 2009, 101).
Source |
Amount (in million dollars) |
International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development |
30.7 |
International Monetary |
9.0 |
American Export-Import
Bank |
55.0 |
West Germany |
58.0 |
Britain |
47.6 |
Switzerland |
16.1 |
France |
14.3 |
Austria |
10.0 |
Egypt |
8.0 |
Netherland |
4.2 |
Norway |
0.3 |
Total |
267.2 |
Food
Aid to “Deflector” from Soviet Bloc: The Yugoslav Drought of 1950 and American
Emergency Relief Assistance
The catastrophic effects
of the severe drought in Yugoslavia posed real threat to the very existence of
Tito’s regime. The total loss caused to Yugoslav agriculture by the drought
amounts about 21 billion dinnars. Productions of major food for citizens’
consumption dramatically decreased: the reduced rates of productions of wheat,
corn, potatos, and fodder are 26%, 35%, 30%, and 20-35% (National Security
Council 1950).
The
Drought of 1951 led to the severe decline in Yugoslavs living standard. In both
rural and urban scale, extreme saving of food needed to be implemented in order
to survive the Drought. In the National Security Progress Report on October 16,
1950, American provided some advices for Yugoslavs to satisfy the country’s
minimum requirements such as slaughtering and exporting certain amount of
livestocks (National Security Council 1950). In order to maintain the minimum
demand, American suggested Yugoslavs slaughter 2.25 million heads of cattles,
4.20 million heads of sheep, and 3 million heads of pigs. American also suggest
Yugoslav could export 50,000 heads of cattles, 100,000 heads of sheep, and
10,000 heads of horses (National Security Council 1950).
The
Drought greatly affected Yugoslavs import in 1951. Yugoslavs had to increase
their budget to import much more agricultural goods in order to survive the
Drought.
Item |
Tons |
Dinars 000’s omitted |
Dinars 000’s omitted |
Edible Fats |
40,000 |
520,000 |
10,400 |
Corn |
100,000 |
350,000 |
7,000 |
Wheat |
50,000 |
213,000 |
4,260 |
Vegetables and Rice |
|
350,000 |
7,000 |
Beans |
30,000 |
244,000 |
4,880 |
Sugar |
35,000 |
300,000 |
6,000 |
Oats |
100,000 |
250,000 |
5,000 |
Barley |
50,000 |
150,000 |
3,000 |
Fodder |
50,000 |
125,000 |
2,500 |
Seeds |
|
200,000 |
4,000 |
Total |
|
2,702,000 |
54,040** |
*This list shows victuals which Yugoslavia has to
import and which ordinarily are not imported articles.
**Real needs for the imported quantities of victuals
are greater on account of the total losses causes by the drought, however, this
list shows the most necessary minimum.; Source: National Security Council.
1950. National Security Council Progress Report on the Implementation of United
States Policy toward the Conflict between the USSR and Yugoslavia (NSC 18/4)
and Economic Relations between the United States and Yugoslavia (NSC 18/2).
October 16.
The formal
request to United States for assistance from Yugoslavia occurred on October 20,
1950 estimated the total need for food assistance at approximately $55 million.
Later, this figure increased to $75 million. By October 3, Yugoslav losses had
amounted to $105 million “that could only be overcome by extraordinary
assistance from abroad” (U.S. Department of State 1950). United States launched
the Stop-Gap Aid Framework, which totaled approximately $33,500,000 for food
purchases and delivery involved the Economic Cooperation Administration, the
Export-Import Bank and Mutual Defense Aid Funds. All three institutions and
programs provided emergent funds for Yugoslavia to purchase food. “The Economic
Cooperation Administration arrangements for the delivery of wheat flour in the
amount of $11,500,000 to Yugoslavia. The Export-Import Bank made available to
Yugoslavia credits of about $6 million for the purchase and transport of food
(lard, beans, dried eggs, and canned meat). The Mutual Defense Assistance
Program under the Mutual Defense Assistance Act provided Yugoslavia with
certain foodstuffs including wheat flour, corn, barley, lard and sugar (Whilte
House Central Files, 1950).
American plan
to provide food aid to Yugoslavia could be divided into two stages. The first
stage, U.S. officials could provide the first emergent food aid to Yugoslavia
without Congressional approval. The first aid valued $30.8 million, provided
Export-Import Bank, Mutual Defense Assistance fund, and Economic Cooperation
Administration fund. The second aid needed Congressional approval. It included
125,000 tons of corn, 125,000 tons of feed grain, 50,000 tons of vegetables and
15,000 tons of seed (U.S. Department of State 1950, 1489-1499).
In
December 1950, the Emergency Relief Act was passed by Congress and Yugoslavia
received $50 million in relief, with another $38 million under the Marshall
Plan (Lampe J. and Russell R. 1990, 37). The Congress appoved the second stage
of food aid to Yugoslavia containing 125,000 tons of corn, 125,000 tonso feed
grain, 50,000 tons of vegetable and/or rice, and 15,000 tons of seed (U.S.
Department of State 1950, 1489-1499). In the whole year of 1950, Yugoslavia
received $6.1 million from American Export-Import Bank to purchase procured
beans, eggs and canned eggs, $12.5 million from Mutual Defense Program to
purchase 9,000 tons of lard, 32,000 tons of flour, 25,000 tons of sugar, and
$12.2 million to purchase 110,000 tons of flours.
Conclusion
The
goal of United States generous economic and food aids to Yugoslavia is to “keep
Tito afloat,” which is equal to maintain existence of Tito’s regime, against
the Soviet bloc. After the end of the Second World War, the fundamental
strategic orientations of Soviet Union and Yugoslavia began to diverge. The
Soviets expulsion of Yugoslavs out of Cominform signalized the total split
between Tito and Stalin.
For American,
although Yugoslavia is a communist country, its expulsion by Soviets
demonstrate that Soviet bloc countries are not united together against the
West. Using economic aid to further widen the gaps among bloc countries became
a feasible choice for Americans.
Firstly,
immediately after the Second World War, U.S. led Western world provided
tremendous material support to Yugoslavia through the form of UNRRA. The aid
from UNRRA helped Yugoslavs to rebuild and rehabilitate agriculture, industry,
and economy. In June 1947, UNRRA aid to Yugoslavia came to an end due to mutual
suspicions toward each others’ intentions.
After the
Soviet-Yugoslav split, Soviet Union launched a total economic blockade together
with other Cominform countries. Due to Yugoslav highly dependent economic
relationship with Soviet bloc, the severe losses result from the Cominform
blockade posed a real threat to the Tito’s regime. By keeping Tito afloat under
the pressure from Soviet bloc, American actually was encouraging other bloc
countries to rise up against Soviet hegemony. Americans continued to expand
their economic relation with Yugoslavia in order to offset Yugoslavs losses
from the Cominform blockade. United States actively mobilized domestic and
international financial institutions such as Export-Import Bank, Federal
Reserve, Economic Cooperation Administration, World Bank, and International
Monetary Fund to extend credits and loans to Yugoslavia. U.S. share of export
and import in Yugoslav economy quickly increased as a result of more and more
frequent economic interactions.
In 1950,
severe Drought hit Yugoslavia which causes dramatic declines in Yugoslav
agricultural production and foreign trade. American quickly responded by
providing Stop-Gap aid. The Congress passed the Emergency Relief Act of 1951
which allowed United States to provide emergent food assistance to Yugoslavia
using funds from previous mutual framework such as Mutual Defense Act, Mutual
Security Act, and previously mentioned financial institutions.
“Yugoslavia’s
continued fight against Soviet threat was now acknowledged to be in the
national interests of the United States.” By providing economic aids to
Yugoslavia, their struggle to overcome the effects of the Cominform economic
blockade had been successfully concluded by an orientation of Yugoslavia’s
international economic relations westward. Finally U.S. Congress in 1951
announced Yugoslavia no longer stood alone in its resistance to Cominform aggressive
pressure (U.S. Congress 1951, 12).
Bibliography
A.Z.
(1956) The Soviet-Yugoslav Economic
Relations 1945-1955. The World Today.
Royal Institute of International Affairs. 12(1): 36-38.
Campell
J. (1967) Tito’s Separate Road: America
and Yugoslavia in World Politics. 28. New York. Harper & Raw
Publishers.
Ceh
N. (1998) United States-Yugoslav
Relations During the Early Cold War. 1945-1957. 167. 98-107. University of
Illinois at Chicago PhD Thesis.
Central
Intelligence Agency. (1977) Economic
Situation in Yugoslavia. CIA Historical Review Program Release in Full.
17-20. 24.
>Jovanov
S. (2009) Yugoslav-American Relationships
during the Truman Presidency: Truman’s Eggs and Tito’s Separate Road. 8-30.
54-56. 64-68. 70-75. 101. University of Alabama in Huntsville PhD Thesis.
Lampe
J. and Russell R. (eds.) (1990) Yugoslav-American
Economic Relations Since World War II. 21. 32. 30. 40-41. 37. Durham. Duke
University Press.
Lees
L. (1997) Keeping Tito Afloat: the United
States, Yugoslavia, and the Cold War. 52-53. University Park. the
Pennsylvania State University Press.
National Security Council. (1949) National Security
Council Progress Report by Acting Secretary of States on the Implementation of
Economic Relations Between the United States and Yugoslavia (NSC 18/2), May 27.
National Security Council. (1949) National Security
Council Progress Report on the Implementation of Economic Relations Between the
United States and Yugoslavia (NSC 18/2). November 9.
National
Security Council. (1950) National Security Council Progress Report on the
Implementation of United States Policy toward the Conflict between the USSR and
Yugoslavia (NSC 18/4) and Economic Relations between the United States and
Yugoslavia (NSC 18/2). October 16.
Sarkovic
T. (1986) Direct Foreign Investment in
Yugoslavia: A Microeconomic Model, 65-68. New York.
Savezni
Zavod za Statistiku. (1982). Razvoj
Jugoslavije. 1947-1981. Beograd. 124.
Singleton
F. (1976) Twentieth-Century Yugoslavia.
Columbia University Press.
Sternberg
F. (1952) “Tito’s Unique Yugoslavia.” The
Nation. CLXXIV. March 8. 226
Swissler
J. (1993) The Transformations of American
Cold War Policy toward Yugoslavia. 1948-1951. 86-98. 75-76. 99-100. 183.
309. University of Hawaii PhD Thesis.
U.S.
Congress. (1951) U.S. Congressional Record. 81st Congress, 2nd
Session, 96:12.
U.S.
Department of Stale. (1951) Memorandum of Conversation, Signed by Acheson,
October 20, 1950. Papers of Dean Aceson. Box 64. Harry S. Truman Presidential
Library. Independence, Missouri, 1; U.S. Congress, House of Representatives,
Committee on Foreign Affairs, Yugoslav Emergency Relief Assistance: Letter from
the Secretary o f State, 82nd. Congress, 1st Session, House Document No. 112,
Serial No. 822275. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1951)
22-23.
U.S. Department of States. (1948) Foreign Relations of the United States. 4: 546-568.
U.S. Department of States. (1950) Foreign Relations of the United States. 4: 1489-1499.
White
House Central Files. (1950) Memorandum of Press Release for President Truman on
November 29 1950. Box 26, 2. Harry S. Truman Presidential Library,
Independence. Missouri.
*Zeng Qingming - Institute of International Relations, Faculty of Political Science
and International Studies, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmiescie 26/28,
00-927 Warszawa, Poland e-mail: 1821339784@qq.com
© 2010, IJORS - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN STUDIES